undefined
Continuing on genocidal organizations trading on Palestine while aiding & abetting other genocides, I see ANSWER coalition is in the mix. Another organizer of People's Conference for Palestine. I also see "The People's Forum," along with the usual suspects, Breakthrough News.
This event co-organized by agents of the Eritrean regime was to tell you that #TigrayGenocide was fake. The ANSWER coalition co-sponsored this event gaslighting victims of genocide, with the actual genociders themselves.🧵
When I say the research community, I mean this specific research community. ICLR was the home base of the OpenAIs and such. I remember when it was created and how so many of us didn't want to be near it because it was brocentral and sexism central.
No other community deserves whatever is happening more than the research community that brought this on us. What you unleashed coming back to eat its own.
"We note that in the extreme case where an LLM might be used to produce an entire piece of research, we still require a human author for accountability."
What's the point of submitting papers or singing up as a reviewer at these conferences? Why don't we just have LLM generated "papers" be met with LLM generated "reviews" and call it a day?
While it is the LLM that is “obliging” by providing the positive review, the reviewer is ultimately responsible for the LLM’s review, and consequently they would bear the consequences. On the other hand, we consider the injection of such a prompt by an author to be an attempt at collusion which would similarly be a code of ethics violation."
And you know they added this because someone actually did it and a reviewer who I presume was using an LLM to review, found this out.
Truly wild reading.
"If such a prompt injection is included in a submission and it consequently results in a positive LLM-generated review, we consider this a form of collusion (which, as per past precedent, is a Code of Ethics violation) that both the paper authors and the reviewer would be held accountable for, because it involves the author explicitly requesting and receiving a positive review.
https://blog.iclr.cc/2025/08/26/policies-on-large-language-model-usage-at-iclr-2026/
In our work documenting the social media failures contributing to #TigrayGenocide (https://dair-institute.org/tigray-genocide), we tried to be proactive in thinking about what we can contribute to the foundation of the new social media platforms being built. We also tried to issue a warning of the current rampant incitement to violence and warmongering on social media, preparing the groundwork for another devastating war.