Salta al contenuto
0
  • Categorie
  • Recenti
  • Tag
  • Popolare
  • Mondo
  • Utenti
  • Gruppi
  • Categorie
  • Recenti
  • Tag
  • Popolare
  • Mondo
  • Utenti
  • Gruppi
Collassa

Forum Federato

Di Piero Bosio
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. Senza categoria
  4. people who code with AI are a joke and if you fit that descriptor I need you to understand that all of us actual programmers are making fun of you

people who code with AI are a joke and if you fit that descriptor I need you to understand that all of us actual programmers are making fun of you

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Senza categoria
11 Post 6 Autori 0 Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Topic risposta
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • Eniko Foxundefined Eniko Fox

    people who code with AI are a joke and if you fit that descriptor I need you to understand that all of us actual programmers are making fun of you

    Eniko Foxundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    Eniko Foxundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    Eniko Fox
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #2

    people who think turning all coding into "debugging shitty code someone else wrote" is somehow going to yield productivity gains

    Christopher Snowhillundefined Eniko Foxundefined 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta
    1
    • Eniko Foxundefined Eniko Fox

      people who think turning all coding into "debugging shitty code someone else wrote" is somehow going to yield productivity gains

      Christopher Snowhillundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      Christopher Snowhillundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      Christopher Snowhill
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #3

      @eniko Meanwhile, my current big project, Cog, is somebody else's code that I forked and then piled over 2000 new commits onto.

      Somehow I found it easier to start with someone else's complete project than to start my own project from scratch.

      Which then makes me wonder what the heck is up with all the people who want access to my old code so they can fork it and continue to maintain it, when it probably wasn't that special or original to begin with. Which is doubly complicated by the fact I dashed that code to heck because the lead developer of the project I was extending is a fricking chud and I want nothing to do with him or the Windows operating system any more, and don't want to help people who want to work with him either.

      Eniko Foxundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      • Christopher Snowhillundefined Christopher Snowhill

        @eniko Meanwhile, my current big project, Cog, is somebody else's code that I forked and then piled over 2000 new commits onto.

        Somehow I found it easier to start with someone else's complete project than to start my own project from scratch.

        Which then makes me wonder what the heck is up with all the people who want access to my old code so they can fork it and continue to maintain it, when it probably wasn't that special or original to begin with. Which is doubly complicated by the fact I dashed that code to heck because the lead developer of the project I was extending is a fricking chud and I want nothing to do with him or the Windows operating system any more, and don't want to help people who want to work with him either.

        Eniko Foxundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        Eniko Foxundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        Eniko Fox
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #4

        @chris i mean it's fine to not want to do all the work of being an actual programmer. where i take issue is people putting together AI slop and proudly proclaiming not only are they real programmers, they're better and putting together buggy AI slop is the way of the future

        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        1
        • Eniko Foxundefined Eniko Fox

          people who think turning all coding into "debugging shitty code someone else wrote" is somehow going to yield productivity gains

          Eniko Foxundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          Eniko Foxundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          Eniko Fox
          scritto su ultima modifica di
          #5

          if you follow me and feel positively towards AI i should warn you that you will not find my opinions on AI palatable and you will not change my mind about them

          Eniko Foxundefined Robin-Yann Stormundefined 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta
          1
          • Eniko Foxundefined Eniko Fox

            if you follow me and feel positively towards AI i should warn you that you will not find my opinions on AI palatable and you will not change my mind about them

            Eniko Foxundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            Eniko Foxundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            Eniko Fox
            scritto su ultima modifica di
            #6

            "but eniko you will lose follows"

            that is acceptable

            Jari Komppa 🇫🇮undefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
            1
            • Eniko Foxundefined Eniko Fox

              "but eniko you will lose follows"

              that is acceptable

              Jari Komppa 🇫🇮undefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              Jari Komppa 🇫🇮undefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              Jari Komppa 🇫🇮
              scritto su ultima modifica di
              #7

              @eniko I'm fairly sure masto is an ai-hostile bubble, but that may just be my impression.

              Eniko Foxundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
              • Jari Komppa 🇫🇮undefined Jari Komppa 🇫🇮

                @eniko I'm fairly sure masto is an ai-hostile bubble, but that may just be my impression.

                Eniko Foxundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                Eniko Foxundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                Eniko Fox
                scritto su ultima modifica di
                #8

                @sol_hsa not enough of one, it appears

                1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                1
                • Eniko Foxundefined Eniko Fox

                  if you follow me and feel positively towards AI i should warn you that you will not find my opinions on AI palatable and you will not change my mind about them

                  Robin-Yann Stormundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  Robin-Yann Stormundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  Robin-Yann Storm
                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                  #9

                  @eniko I disagree, because when you say "feel positively towards AI", you are essentially giving up the foothold game development had for decades, to the new nomenclature of extreme fallibility and cost of LLMs.

                  We have been using 'AI' and 'Procedural Generation' for decades in games. That the LLMs now want to pretend only their thing is 'AI', is awful.

                  A full response would be very long and I have had this conversation a lot, so here is a video that explains it best: https://youtu.be/CeZ_rcDQg6Q?t=925

                  1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                  1
                  • Eniko Foxundefined Eniko Fox

                    people who code with AI are a joke and if you fit that descriptor I need you to understand that all of us actual programmers are making fun of you

                    NullDott(Comms Open 5/6)undefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    NullDott(Comms Open 5/6)undefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    NullDott(Comms Open 5/6)
                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                    #10

                    @eniko The gatekeeping claims in this thread are crazy to me, this is not a childish "if you code in X you're not a real programmer because real programmers code in Y".

                    LLMs and "AI Tools" for programming are terrible, not only performing what's supposed to be their job, they also bring a lot of more problems outside and inside than actual benefits.

                    If you can't or don't want to see this, it's up to you, but don't expect me or many more to take you seriously, like at all lol

                    Oblomovundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                    1
                    • NullDott(Comms Open 5/6)undefined NullDott(Comms Open 5/6)

                      @eniko The gatekeeping claims in this thread are crazy to me, this is not a childish "if you code in X you're not a real programmer because real programmers code in Y".

                      LLMs and "AI Tools" for programming are terrible, not only performing what's supposed to be their job, they also bring a lot of more problems outside and inside than actual benefits.

                      If you can't or don't want to see this, it's up to you, but don't expect me or many more to take you seriously, like at all lol

                      Oblomovundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      Oblomovundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      Oblomov
                      scritto su ultima modifica di
                      #11

                      @NullTheFool @eniko

                      sadly people generally aren't appreciative of being made aware that something they like, especially something that they recently got passionate about, is actually shit, damaging for them and for anyone around

                      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                      Rispondi
                      • Topic risposta
                      Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
                      • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
                      • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
                      • Più Voti


                      • Accedi

                      • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
                      • Primo post
                        Ultimo post