Salta al contenuto
0
  • Categorie
  • Recenti
  • Tag
  • Popolare
  • Mondo
  • Utenti
  • Gruppi
  • Categorie
  • Recenti
  • Tag
  • Popolare
  • Mondo
  • Utenti
  • Gruppi
Collassa

Forum Federato

Di Piero Bosio
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. Star Trek Social Club
  4. Why doesn't Star Trek use TrekLit for streaming shows?

Why doesn't Star Trek use TrekLit for streaming shows?

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Star Trek Social Club
startrek
3 Post 3 Autori 0 Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Topic risposta
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    stillpaisleycat@startrek.website
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #1

    Treklit has some great offerings. The Relaunch universe books in particular developed coherent serialized storylines and a group of strong authors. There is also a deep library of standalone books from across all eras of the franchise.

    By contrast, serialized Star Trek is struggling onscreen. Of the current era, only Prodigy has excelled in serialized storytelling.

    So, why not look to the books? Not just to lift an idea like Control or the end of the Borg, but to actually tell a coherent narrative across a season or season?

    On Netflix, Prime and Apple, it’s become established that successful streaming shows are often based on novels and novel series. Those streamers have come to understand that novelists, not scriptwriters, excel in laying out long form storytelling, and resources are often better put in having the screenwriters adapt than create from the whole cloth.

    Reading a recent interview with Mick Herron, author of the critically acclaimed and popular Slow Horses on Apple, with a second show based on his other books launching this fall, I was struck by the interviewer’s assertion of this truism.

    I thought about several of the non franchise shows I enjoy and how many of them are more or less faithful adaptations of books.

    I was also struck by the thought that both Skydance and Paramount are quite capable of producing excellent book adaptations for Netflix and Apple. Murderbot is a very current example.

    So, what’s holding back Star Trek from exploiting the Vanguard series or the Starfleet Core of Engineers books?

    Why insist on giving showrunners resources to keep retelling franchise stories with legacy characters and tropes?

    Why not exploit that IP that Paramount already owns by adapting the best of decades of TrekLit?

    roofuskit@lemmy.worldundefined julianundefined 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta
    • stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined stillpaisleycat@startrek.website

      Treklit has some great offerings. The Relaunch universe books in particular developed coherent serialized storylines and a group of strong authors. There is also a deep library of standalone books from across all eras of the franchise.

      By contrast, serialized Star Trek is struggling onscreen. Of the current era, only Prodigy has excelled in serialized storytelling.

      So, why not look to the books? Not just to lift an idea like Control or the end of the Borg, but to actually tell a coherent narrative across a season or season?

      On Netflix, Prime and Apple, it’s become established that successful streaming shows are often based on novels and novel series. Those streamers have come to understand that novelists, not scriptwriters, excel in laying out long form storytelling, and resources are often better put in having the screenwriters adapt than create from the whole cloth.

      Reading a recent interview with Mick Herron, author of the critically acclaimed and popular Slow Horses on Apple, with a second show based on his other books launching this fall, I was struck by the interviewer’s assertion of this truism.

      I thought about several of the non franchise shows I enjoy and how many of them are more or less faithful adaptations of books.

      I was also struck by the thought that both Skydance and Paramount are quite capable of producing excellent book adaptations for Netflix and Apple. Murderbot is a very current example.

      So, what’s holding back Star Trek from exploiting the Vanguard series or the Starfleet Core of Engineers books?

      Why insist on giving showrunners resources to keep retelling franchise stories with legacy characters and tropes?

      Why not exploit that IP that Paramount already owns by adapting the best of decades of TrekLit?

      roofuskit@lemmy.worldundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      roofuskit@lemmy.worldundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      roofuskit@lemmy.world
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #2

      Almost nobody making the shows has read them, absolutely nobody in executive positions has read them, and only a small fraction of the existing fan base that they are tapping into have read them.

      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      • stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined stillpaisleycat@startrek.website

        Treklit has some great offerings. The Relaunch universe books in particular developed coherent serialized storylines and a group of strong authors. There is also a deep library of standalone books from across all eras of the franchise.

        By contrast, serialized Star Trek is struggling onscreen. Of the current era, only Prodigy has excelled in serialized storytelling.

        So, why not look to the books? Not just to lift an idea like Control or the end of the Borg, but to actually tell a coherent narrative across a season or season?

        On Netflix, Prime and Apple, it’s become established that successful streaming shows are often based on novels and novel series. Those streamers have come to understand that novelists, not scriptwriters, excel in laying out long form storytelling, and resources are often better put in having the screenwriters adapt than create from the whole cloth.

        Reading a recent interview with Mick Herron, author of the critically acclaimed and popular Slow Horses on Apple, with a second show based on his other books launching this fall, I was struck by the interviewer’s assertion of this truism.

        I thought about several of the non franchise shows I enjoy and how many of them are more or less faithful adaptations of books.

        I was also struck by the thought that both Skydance and Paramount are quite capable of producing excellent book adaptations for Netflix and Apple. Murderbot is a very current example.

        So, what’s holding back Star Trek from exploiting the Vanguard series or the Starfleet Core of Engineers books?

        Why insist on giving showrunners resources to keep retelling franchise stories with legacy characters and tropes?

        Why not exploit that IP that Paramount already owns by adapting the best of decades of TrekLit?

        julianundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        julianundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        julian
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #3

        Honestly it could be something as prohibitive as not having secured film and TV rights from the authors.

        I can imagine that doing it after the fact is often quite expensive.

        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        Rispondi
        • Topic risposta
        Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
        • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
        • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
        • Più Voti


        • Accedi

        • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
        • Primo post
          Ultimo post