Salta al contenuto
0
  • Categorie
  • Recenti
  • Tag
  • Popolare
  • Mondo
  • Utenti
  • Gruppi
  • Categorie
  • Recenti
  • Tag
  • Popolare
  • Mondo
  • Utenti
  • Gruppi
Collassa

Forum Federato

Di Piero Bosio
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. Star Trek Social Club
  4. Michelle Yeoh Admits “We Could Have Done Better” With ‘Star Trek: Section 31’

Michelle Yeoh Admits “We Could Have Done Better” With ‘Star Trek: Section 31’

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Star Trek Social Club
startrek
22 Post 13 Autori 0 Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Topic risposta
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • damage@feddit.itundefined damage@feddit.it

    You could have done something else.
    The cool thing about Section 31 was that it was ambiguous, did it really exist? Was it just one crazy guy? Then Discovery blew that up, and we could have just tried to forget it, but no, let's make a movie about it.

    Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    Value Subtracted
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #5

    it was ambiguous, did it really exist? Was it just one crazy guy?

    This was never credible, and was never how it was presented in DS9.

    Even in "Inquisition", Sloan had two other guys standing next to him, and an entire starship at his disposal. Starfleet Command covered for him at the end - something that was noted by the DS9 senior staff.

    In subsequent episodes, Admiral Ross acknowledged their existence, and Bashir worked out what he believed to be the bare minimum number of operatives required to create the morphogenic virus (73).

    Later, we saw them working for the United Earth Starfleet in the ENT era.

    The only suggestion that it's just "once crazy guy" comes from Koval, who then helps Sloan fake his death and is revealed to be a S31 asset in the very next scene.

    So no, that's not really something Discovery changed. People have had to wilfully ignore the DS9 episodes to buy into that theory.

    thessnake03@lemmy.worldundefined damage@feddit.itundefined 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta
    • blueamigafan@lemmy.worldundefined blueamigafan@lemmy.world

      I know it wasnt the greatest thing that's ever been done under the star trek name, but I do think this could be the thing to get non Trekkies into trek. It was basically a fast and furious / mission impossible movie that happened to be in the star Trek universe. Sometimes something stupid but accessible can get people into a larger franchise. I am also really into Thunderbirds, the old puppet show made in the 60's it got repeated in the UK in the 90's and became a huge phenomenon way bigger than the first time it was shown. So inevitably a live action movie was made in the 00's and it was absolutely awful, however when I have encountered younger fans who are into Thunderbirds they always point to the live action as their first exposure to it which led onto the original show. The only way was up once you got into it.

      Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      Value Subtracted
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #6

      I think that was definitely the idea. I'm somewhat skeptical that it worked, but it would be cool if it was a gateway movie for someone.

      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      • Value Subtractedundefined Value Subtracted

        it was ambiguous, did it really exist? Was it just one crazy guy?

        This was never credible, and was never how it was presented in DS9.

        Even in "Inquisition", Sloan had two other guys standing next to him, and an entire starship at his disposal. Starfleet Command covered for him at the end - something that was noted by the DS9 senior staff.

        In subsequent episodes, Admiral Ross acknowledged their existence, and Bashir worked out what he believed to be the bare minimum number of operatives required to create the morphogenic virus (73).

        Later, we saw them working for the United Earth Starfleet in the ENT era.

        The only suggestion that it's just "once crazy guy" comes from Koval, who then helps Sloan fake his death and is revealed to be a S31 asset in the very next scene.

        So no, that's not really something Discovery changed. People have had to wilfully ignore the DS9 episodes to buy into that theory.

        thessnake03@lemmy.worldundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        thessnake03@lemmy.worldundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        thessnake03@lemmy.world
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #7

        In ENT it's very heavy handed that Malcom uses to work for section 31, and they really want him back. Big part of a story arc in the last season.

        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        • hopesdeadundefined hopesdead
          This post did not contain any content.
          observantTrapeziumundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          observantTrapeziumundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          observantTrapezium
          scritto su ultima modifica di
          #8

          Understatement of the century

          stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
          • Value Subtractedundefined Value Subtracted

            the characters that we built and the rapport that we had with each other was amazing

            I have to admit, I thought Alok was a pretty interesting character. Sam Richardson was also very charismatic as Quasi, though he didn't have much to do. And Young Garrett was okay, too.

            I wouldn't mind seeing any of those characters pop up again, with a better story.

            malikmuaddibsoong@startrek.websiteundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            malikmuaddibsoong@startrek.websiteundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            malikmuaddibsoong@startrek.website
            scritto su ultima modifica di
            #9

            It’s a good distinction to make that the characters were much more interesting than the story we saw.

            I looked at a list of characters and I rank 4/7 of them as interesting, but sadly half of those were killed off 😞

            Space Hitler: 👎

            Space Common: 👎

            Quasi: 👍

            Zeph 🪦: 👍

            Garrett: 👍

            Fuzz 🪦: 👎

            Melle 🪦: 👍

            Value Subtractedundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
            • malikmuaddibsoong@startrek.websiteundefined malikmuaddibsoong@startrek.website

              It’s a good distinction to make that the characters were much more interesting than the story we saw.

              I looked at a list of characters and I rank 4/7 of them as interesting, but sadly half of those were killed off 😞

              Space Hitler: 👎

              Space Common: 👎

              Quasi: 👍

              Zeph 🪦: 👍

              Garrett: 👍

              Fuzz 🪦: 👎

              Melle 🪦: 👍

              Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              Value Subtracted
              scritto su ultima modifica di
              #10

              I obviously think Georgiou is a more interesting character than you do, but other than that, I agree with this list.

              1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
              • hopesdeadundefined hopesdead
                This post did not contain any content.
                ragas@lemmy.mlundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                ragas@lemmy.mlundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                ragas@lemmy.ml
                scritto su ultima modifica di
                #11

                Its total bullshit to place a dystopian organisation so close to the center of a utopian society. It basically calls the whole society into question.

                James R Kirkundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                • hopesdeadundefined hopesdead
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  buzz86us@lemmy.worldundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  buzz86us@lemmy.worldundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  buzz86us@lemmy.world
                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                  #12

                  Let's cancel a TV show we just shot several episodes of and edit it into a movie!!

                  Value Subtractedundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                  • buzz86us@lemmy.worldundefined buzz86us@lemmy.world

                    Let's cancel a TV show we just shot several episodes of and edit it into a movie!!

                    Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    Value Subtracted
                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                    #13

                    The pivot-to-movie happened well before anything was filmed.

                    But it does seem like the "pivot" was trying to stuff ten hours of story into a two-hour bag.

                    1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                    • Value Subtractedundefined Value Subtracted

                      it was ambiguous, did it really exist? Was it just one crazy guy?

                      This was never credible, and was never how it was presented in DS9.

                      Even in "Inquisition", Sloan had two other guys standing next to him, and an entire starship at his disposal. Starfleet Command covered for him at the end - something that was noted by the DS9 senior staff.

                      In subsequent episodes, Admiral Ross acknowledged their existence, and Bashir worked out what he believed to be the bare minimum number of operatives required to create the morphogenic virus (73).

                      Later, we saw them working for the United Earth Starfleet in the ENT era.

                      The only suggestion that it's just "once crazy guy" comes from Koval, who then helps Sloan fake his death and is revealed to be a S31 asset in the very next scene.

                      So no, that's not really something Discovery changed. People have had to wilfully ignore the DS9 episodes to buy into that theory.

                      damage@feddit.itundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      damage@feddit.itundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      damage@feddit.it
                      scritto su ultima modifica di
                      #14

                      Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment. Is it possible that Sloan just blackmailed or forced all those others into following his orders? Yes. Plausible? Eh...
                      Still, the point is the mistery, the ambiguity. Barely anyone knows they exist, Sisko, an experienced commander, didn't know about them. The bigger they make them, the more unbelievable that becomes.

                      steletrovilo@beehaw.orgundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                      • damage@feddit.itundefined damage@feddit.it

                        Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment. Is it possible that Sloan just blackmailed or forced all those others into following his orders? Yes. Plausible? Eh...
                        Still, the point is the mistery, the ambiguity. Barely anyone knows they exist, Sisko, an experienced commander, didn't know about them. The bigger they make them, the more unbelievable that becomes.

                        steletrovilo@beehaw.orgundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        steletrovilo@beehaw.orgundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        steletrovilo@beehaw.org
                        scritto su ultima modifica di
                        #15

                        Nah. DS9 made a big point of showing people doing bad things to accomplish good goals, while always questioning if those were actually good. Nothing about Section 31 is worse than what Sisko does in "In the Pale Moonlight" for example. And after so much about the Tal Shiar, the Obsidian Order, and the actual conspiracies within Starfleet (see STVI, the season finale of TNG season 1, The Pegasus, and Insurrection), Section 31 is not a far stretch at all.

                        "Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment."

                        Yes, people are allowed to do that.

                        damage@feddit.itundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                        • ragas@lemmy.mlundefined ragas@lemmy.ml

                          Its total bullshit to place a dystopian organisation so close to the center of a utopian society. It basically calls the whole society into question.

                          James R Kirkundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          James R Kirkundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          James R Kirk
                          scritto su ultima modifica di
                          #16

                          And yet oddly enough that is not the issue with the Section 31 movie

                          ragas@lemmy.mlundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                          • steletrovilo@beehaw.orgundefined steletrovilo@beehaw.org

                            Nah. DS9 made a big point of showing people doing bad things to accomplish good goals, while always questioning if those were actually good. Nothing about Section 31 is worse than what Sisko does in "In the Pale Moonlight" for example. And after so much about the Tal Shiar, the Obsidian Order, and the actual conspiracies within Starfleet (see STVI, the season finale of TNG season 1, The Pegasus, and Insurrection), Section 31 is not a far stretch at all.

                            "Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment."

                            Yes, people are allowed to do that.

                            damage@feddit.itundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                            damage@feddit.itundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                            damage@feddit.it
                            scritto su ultima modifica di
                            #17

                            I love DS9 and its grey morality approach, it's a good contrast to TNG's attempts at "moral perfection", and in my comments I didn't criticize S31's existence, just that the misterious, barely there approach of DS9 was perfect for that, subsequent stories completely failed to respect the original incarnation, which in my opinion was better, and whose abandonment causes continuity issues

                            1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                            • observantTrapeziumundefined observantTrapezium

                              Understatement of the century

                              stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                              stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                              stillpaisleycat@startrek.website
                              scritto su ultima modifica di
                              #18

                              This headline is a quote out of context that is being used to imply an admission.

                              I don’t mind the inference that the movie wasn’t what Yeoh had hoped it might be, but the headline is a misrepresentation of what she said.

                              What Yeoh actually said is:

                              Every time I finish a movie or something, I always think, ‘I could have done better,’ so it’s nothing new. That’s how you always have to think to improve yourself and to hopefully be better the next time.

                              My partner and I seem to be among the relatively few longtime fans who found the S31 film a blast. I still have to wonder though what we might have got if Kim and Lippoldt had been able to run the show that they originally conceived before Paramount added a male non-Asian action flick show runner ‘for experience’. The episode they wrote for Georgiou in S3 of Discovery was excellent and they have been successful writing on Sweet Tooth for seasons 2&3 since they moved on from Trek..

                              observantTrapeziumundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                              • James R Kirkundefined James R Kirk

                                And yet oddly enough that is not the issue with the Section 31 movie

                                ragas@lemmy.mlundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                ragas@lemmy.mlundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                ragas@lemmy.ml
                                scritto su ultima modifica di
                                #19

                                Ok, even better that I didn't watch it then. I had rejected the movie on principle.

                                1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                • hopesdeadundefined hopesdead
                                  This post did not contain any content.
                                  fixmycode@feddit.clundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                  fixmycode@feddit.clundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                  fixmycode@feddit.cl
                                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                                  #20

                                  a lot of hate for the movie in this thread, hate the suits that develop projects based on the success of others instead of going for what has made their brand successful over the years. if they wanted new audiences they could have tried with something original, but the numbers said otherwise.

                                  1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                  • stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined stillpaisleycat@startrek.website

                                    This headline is a quote out of context that is being used to imply an admission.

                                    I don’t mind the inference that the movie wasn’t what Yeoh had hoped it might be, but the headline is a misrepresentation of what she said.

                                    What Yeoh actually said is:

                                    Every time I finish a movie or something, I always think, ‘I could have done better,’ so it’s nothing new. That’s how you always have to think to improve yourself and to hopefully be better the next time.

                                    My partner and I seem to be among the relatively few longtime fans who found the S31 film a blast. I still have to wonder though what we might have got if Kim and Lippoldt had been able to run the show that they originally conceived before Paramount added a male non-Asian action flick show runner ‘for experience’. The episode they wrote for Georgiou in S3 of Discovery was excellent and they have been successful writing on Sweet Tooth for seasons 2&3 since they moved on from Trek..

                                    observantTrapeziumundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                    observantTrapeziumundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                    observantTrapezium
                                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                                    #21

                                    Thanks for clarifying. I responded to the title only as I didn't actually care what Michelle Yeoh thinks and just want to put this sad story into the dustbin of Trekstory. Georgiou was the only mildly interesting character in Discovery and season 2 was the only mildly not-awful one, so I had moderate hopes for that movie.

                                    1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                    Rispondi
                                    • Topic risposta
                                    Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
                                    • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
                                    • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
                                    • Più Voti


                                    • Accedi

                                    • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
                                    • Primo post
                                      Ultimo post