Salta al contenuto
0
  • Categorie
  • Recenti
  • Tag
  • Popolare
  • Mondo
  • Utenti
  • Gruppi
  • Categorie
  • Recenti
  • Tag
  • Popolare
  • Mondo
  • Utenti
  • Gruppi
Collassa

Forum Federato

Di Piero Bosio
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. Star Trek Social Club
  4. Michelle Yeoh Admits “We Could Have Done Better” With ‘Star Trek: Section 31’

Michelle Yeoh Admits “We Could Have Done Better” With ‘Star Trek: Section 31’

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Star Trek Social Club
startrek
22 Post 13 Autori 0 Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Topic risposta
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • Value Subtractedundefined Value Subtracted

    it was ambiguous, did it really exist? Was it just one crazy guy?

    This was never credible, and was never how it was presented in DS9.

    Even in "Inquisition", Sloan had two other guys standing next to him, and an entire starship at his disposal. Starfleet Command covered for him at the end - something that was noted by the DS9 senior staff.

    In subsequent episodes, Admiral Ross acknowledged their existence, and Bashir worked out what he believed to be the bare minimum number of operatives required to create the morphogenic virus (73).

    Later, we saw them working for the United Earth Starfleet in the ENT era.

    The only suggestion that it's just "once crazy guy" comes from Koval, who then helps Sloan fake his death and is revealed to be a S31 asset in the very next scene.

    So no, that's not really something Discovery changed. People have had to wilfully ignore the DS9 episodes to buy into that theory.

    thessnake03@lemmy.worldundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    thessnake03@lemmy.worldundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    thessnake03@lemmy.world
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #7

    In ENT it's very heavy handed that Malcom uses to work for section 31, and they really want him back. Big part of a story arc in the last season.

    1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
    • hopesdeadundefined hopesdead
      This post did not contain any content.
      observantTrapeziumundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      observantTrapeziumundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      observantTrapezium
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #8

      Understatement of the century

      stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      • Value Subtractedundefined Value Subtracted

        the characters that we built and the rapport that we had with each other was amazing

        I have to admit, I thought Alok was a pretty interesting character. Sam Richardson was also very charismatic as Quasi, though he didn't have much to do. And Young Garrett was okay, too.

        I wouldn't mind seeing any of those characters pop up again, with a better story.

        malikmuaddibsoong@startrek.websiteundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        malikmuaddibsoong@startrek.websiteundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        malikmuaddibsoong@startrek.website
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #9

        It’s a good distinction to make that the characters were much more interesting than the story we saw.

        I looked at a list of characters and I rank 4/7 of them as interesting, but sadly half of those were killed off 😞

        Space Hitler: 👎

        Space Common: 👎

        Quasi: 👍

        Zeph 🪦: 👍

        Garrett: 👍

        Fuzz 🪦: 👎

        Melle 🪦: 👍

        Value Subtractedundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        • malikmuaddibsoong@startrek.websiteundefined malikmuaddibsoong@startrek.website

          It’s a good distinction to make that the characters were much more interesting than the story we saw.

          I looked at a list of characters and I rank 4/7 of them as interesting, but sadly half of those were killed off 😞

          Space Hitler: 👎

          Space Common: 👎

          Quasi: 👍

          Zeph 🪦: 👍

          Garrett: 👍

          Fuzz 🪦: 👎

          Melle 🪦: 👍

          Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          Value Subtracted
          scritto su ultima modifica di
          #10

          I obviously think Georgiou is a more interesting character than you do, but other than that, I agree with this list.

          1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
          • hopesdeadundefined hopesdead
            This post did not contain any content.
            ragas@lemmy.mlundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            ragas@lemmy.mlundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            ragas@lemmy.ml
            scritto su ultima modifica di
            #11

            Its total bullshit to place a dystopian organisation so close to the center of a utopian society. It basically calls the whole society into question.

            James R Kirkundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
            • hopesdeadundefined hopesdead
              This post did not contain any content.
              buzz86us@lemmy.worldundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              buzz86us@lemmy.worldundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              buzz86us@lemmy.world
              scritto su ultima modifica di
              #12

              Let's cancel a TV show we just shot several episodes of and edit it into a movie!!

              Value Subtractedundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
              • buzz86us@lemmy.worldundefined buzz86us@lemmy.world

                Let's cancel a TV show we just shot several episodes of and edit it into a movie!!

                Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                Value Subtractedundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                Value Subtracted
                scritto su ultima modifica di
                #13

                The pivot-to-movie happened well before anything was filmed.

                But it does seem like the "pivot" was trying to stuff ten hours of story into a two-hour bag.

                1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                • Value Subtractedundefined Value Subtracted

                  it was ambiguous, did it really exist? Was it just one crazy guy?

                  This was never credible, and was never how it was presented in DS9.

                  Even in "Inquisition", Sloan had two other guys standing next to him, and an entire starship at his disposal. Starfleet Command covered for him at the end - something that was noted by the DS9 senior staff.

                  In subsequent episodes, Admiral Ross acknowledged their existence, and Bashir worked out what he believed to be the bare minimum number of operatives required to create the morphogenic virus (73).

                  Later, we saw them working for the United Earth Starfleet in the ENT era.

                  The only suggestion that it's just "once crazy guy" comes from Koval, who then helps Sloan fake his death and is revealed to be a S31 asset in the very next scene.

                  So no, that's not really something Discovery changed. People have had to wilfully ignore the DS9 episodes to buy into that theory.

                  damage@feddit.itundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  damage@feddit.itundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  damage@feddit.it
                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                  #14

                  Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment. Is it possible that Sloan just blackmailed or forced all those others into following his orders? Yes. Plausible? Eh...
                  Still, the point is the mistery, the ambiguity. Barely anyone knows they exist, Sisko, an experienced commander, didn't know about them. The bigger they make them, the more unbelievable that becomes.

                  steletrovilo@beehaw.orgundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                  • damage@feddit.itundefined damage@feddit.it

                    Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment. Is it possible that Sloan just blackmailed or forced all those others into following his orders? Yes. Plausible? Eh...
                    Still, the point is the mistery, the ambiguity. Barely anyone knows they exist, Sisko, an experienced commander, didn't know about them. The bigger they make them, the more unbelievable that becomes.

                    steletrovilo@beehaw.orgundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    steletrovilo@beehaw.orgundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    steletrovilo@beehaw.org
                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                    #15

                    Nah. DS9 made a big point of showing people doing bad things to accomplish good goals, while always questioning if those were actually good. Nothing about Section 31 is worse than what Sisko does in "In the Pale Moonlight" for example. And after so much about the Tal Shiar, the Obsidian Order, and the actual conspiracies within Starfleet (see STVI, the season finale of TNG season 1, The Pegasus, and Insurrection), Section 31 is not a far stretch at all.

                    "Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment."

                    Yes, people are allowed to do that.

                    damage@feddit.itundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                    • ragas@lemmy.mlundefined ragas@lemmy.ml

                      Its total bullshit to place a dystopian organisation so close to the center of a utopian society. It basically calls the whole society into question.

                      James R Kirkundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      James R Kirkundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      James R Kirk
                      scritto su ultima modifica di
                      #16

                      And yet oddly enough that is not the issue with the Section 31 movie

                      ragas@lemmy.mlundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                      • steletrovilo@beehaw.orgundefined steletrovilo@beehaw.org

                        Nah. DS9 made a big point of showing people doing bad things to accomplish good goals, while always questioning if those were actually good. Nothing about Section 31 is worse than what Sisko does in "In the Pale Moonlight" for example. And after so much about the Tal Shiar, the Obsidian Order, and the actual conspiracies within Starfleet (see STVI, the season finale of TNG season 1, The Pegasus, and Insurrection), Section 31 is not a far stretch at all.

                        "Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment."

                        Yes, people are allowed to do that.

                        damage@feddit.itundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        damage@feddit.itundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        damage@feddit.it
                        scritto su ultima modifica di
                        #17

                        I love DS9 and its grey morality approach, it's a good contrast to TNG's attempts at "moral perfection", and in my comments I didn't criticize S31's existence, just that the misterious, barely there approach of DS9 was perfect for that, subsequent stories completely failed to respect the original incarnation, which in my opinion was better, and whose abandonment causes continuity issues

                        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                        • observantTrapeziumundefined observantTrapezium

                          Understatement of the century

                          stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          stillpaisleycat@startrek.website
                          scritto su ultima modifica di
                          #18

                          This headline is a quote out of context that is being used to imply an admission.

                          I don’t mind the inference that the movie wasn’t what Yeoh had hoped it might be, but the headline is a misrepresentation of what she said.

                          What Yeoh actually said is:

                          Every time I finish a movie or something, I always think, ‘I could have done better,’ so it’s nothing new. That’s how you always have to think to improve yourself and to hopefully be better the next time.

                          My partner and I seem to be among the relatively few longtime fans who found the S31 film a blast. I still have to wonder though what we might have got if Kim and Lippoldt had been able to run the show that they originally conceived before Paramount added a male non-Asian action flick show runner ‘for experience’. The episode they wrote for Georgiou in S3 of Discovery was excellent and they have been successful writing on Sweet Tooth for seasons 2&3 since they moved on from Trek..

                          observantTrapeziumundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                          • James R Kirkundefined James R Kirk

                            And yet oddly enough that is not the issue with the Section 31 movie

                            ragas@lemmy.mlundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                            ragas@lemmy.mlundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                            ragas@lemmy.ml
                            scritto su ultima modifica di
                            #19

                            Ok, even better that I didn't watch it then. I had rejected the movie on principle.

                            1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                            • hopesdeadundefined hopesdead
                              This post did not contain any content.
                              fixmycode@feddit.clundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                              fixmycode@feddit.clundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                              fixmycode@feddit.cl
                              scritto su ultima modifica di
                              #20

                              a lot of hate for the movie in this thread, hate the suits that develop projects based on the success of others instead of going for what has made their brand successful over the years. if they wanted new audiences they could have tried with something original, but the numbers said otherwise.

                              1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                              • stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteundefined stillpaisleycat@startrek.website

                                This headline is a quote out of context that is being used to imply an admission.

                                I don’t mind the inference that the movie wasn’t what Yeoh had hoped it might be, but the headline is a misrepresentation of what she said.

                                What Yeoh actually said is:

                                Every time I finish a movie or something, I always think, ‘I could have done better,’ so it’s nothing new. That’s how you always have to think to improve yourself and to hopefully be better the next time.

                                My partner and I seem to be among the relatively few longtime fans who found the S31 film a blast. I still have to wonder though what we might have got if Kim and Lippoldt had been able to run the show that they originally conceived before Paramount added a male non-Asian action flick show runner ‘for experience’. The episode they wrote for Georgiou in S3 of Discovery was excellent and they have been successful writing on Sweet Tooth for seasons 2&3 since they moved on from Trek..

                                observantTrapeziumundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                observantTrapeziumundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                observantTrapezium
                                scritto su ultima modifica di
                                #21

                                Thanks for clarifying. I responded to the title only as I didn't actually care what Michelle Yeoh thinks and just want to put this sad story into the dustbin of Trekstory. Georgiou was the only mildly interesting character in Discovery and season 2 was the only mildly not-awful one, so I had moderate hopes for that movie.

                                1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                Rispondi
                                • Topic risposta
                                Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
                                • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
                                • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
                                • Più Voti


                                • Accedi

                                • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
                                • Primo post
                                  Ultimo post